implement ZhaoEtAl tests and move IMR to main project

[Kevin Milner]

Damiano gave us JUnit tests with verification tables for ZhaoEtAl? via e-mail 12/6/10. These should be implemented in our IMR test suite.

Then, we should move ZhaoEtAl? to the main IMR dir to satisfy #19

[Kevin Milner]

I committed a JUnit test, but it doesn't pass yet. Waiting on word from the GEM folks.

Results:

Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 7.266346184250466
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site2.dat
max gm pdiff: 7.2664065991472695
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site3.dat
max gm pdiff: 7.266459979662933
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site4.dat
max gm pdiff: 7.2666376219403865
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r20.0_m6.5_dep10.0_shallow_reverse_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0024571325516434778
max sigma pdiff: 5.790919722724278E-4
Testing: zhao_r20.0_m6.5_dep10.0_shallow_normal_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0029119381169793995
max sigma pdiff: 5.790919722724278E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_slab_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 7.305634162951252
max sigma pdiff: 6.530531024204412E-4
Testing: zhao_r30.0_m5.0_dep30_interf_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 20.256425191982842
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4

[Kevin Milner]

done...tests now pass with a threshold of 0.06%. Ned, should I remove the "UNVERIFIED" tag in the name?

Results:

Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.003459254641260489
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site2.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.00447408684396991
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site3.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.002899414344310582
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site4.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0031704377527741424
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r20.0_m6.5_dep10.0_shallow_reverse_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0024571325516434778
max sigma pdiff: 5.790919722724278E-4
Testing: zhao_r20.0_m6.5_dep10.0_shallow_normal_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0029119381169793995
max sigma pdiff: 5.790919722724278E-4
Testing: zhao_r22.3_m6.5_dep20.0_slab_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.059135865984809355
max sigma pdiff: 6.530531024204412E-4
Testing: zhao_r30.0_m6.5_dep20.0_interf_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.0033831054547612148
max sigma pdiff: 6.618355014417197E-4
Testing: zhao_r150.0_m7.0_dep130.0_slab_site1.dat
max gm pdiff: 0.056857565322545774
max sigma pdiff: 6.530531024204412E-4

[Ned Field]

Sounds good.

Great job!

[Kevin Milner]

Reopening ticket until we have tests for setSite and setEqkRupture

[Kevin Milner]

I implemented a new JUnit test for all IMRs, trunk/test/org/opensha/sha/imr/attenRelImpl/test/GeneralIMR_ParameterTests.java, that tests that parameters are both initialized correctly, and set correctly with setSite/setEqkRupture. With this test, I found that the component parameter wasn't being initialized (it now is).

I'm closing this again.