Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #332, comment 1


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Aug 8, 2011, 11:41:07 AM (13 years ago)
Author:
Kevin Milner
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #332, comment 1

    initial v1  
    66* DistanceX
    77
    8 DistanceX could get tricky with multi fault ruptures. First of all, how would the sign be determined if you had a mix of different fault types? Also, how do you extend the fault trace indefinitely if there are multiple fault traces? You would have to have the fault sections in order, perhaps, and the extend the first and last one? Still, weird things could happen if faults came together at a T. Is there a definition in literature that takes compound surfaces into account?
     8DistanceX could get tricky with multi fault ruptures. First of all, how would the sign be determined if you had a mix of different fault types? Also, how do you extend the fault trace indefinitely if there are multiple fault traces? You would have to have the fault sections in order, perhaps, and then extend the first and last one? Still, weird things could happen if faults came together at a T. Is there a definition in literature that takes compound surfaces into account?
    99
    1010Theoretically, each of these distance calculations could be computed if each fault geometry could supply the following information: